Search found 18 matches
- Wed Apr 23, 2025 10:42 am
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: Mesh-Solid visibility
- Replies: 3
- Views: 18592
Re: Mesh-Solid visibility
Thank you!
- Thu Apr 17, 2025 7:10 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: Mesh-Solid visibility
- Replies: 3
- Views: 18592
Mesh-Solid visibility
Just a question about a visibility behavior. We have a view with several solid entities, some of which are hidden. When we go to wireframe view, all of the entities are shown, even if originally hidden. When back to solid view the hidden objects are now visible. Can the visibility be made persistent?
- Thu Mar 27, 2025 12:24 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: IGES version?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 44237
Re: IGES version?
Thanks, Prashant. We also were surprised to find that the IGES header was not more fully descriptive. The export is working very well for us, this was just to document the version as we have our own IGES file creator (in v4 format).
- Wed Mar 26, 2025 1:35 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: IGES version?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 44237
IGES version?
Just looking to document which flavor of IGES is being exported. OC mentions "up to 5.3", but can you clarify which version you are exporting? Thanks!
- Mon Mar 17, 2025 1:42 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: Memory issues loading in stl files as children entities
- Replies: 9
- Views: 114577
Re: Memory issues loading in stl files as children entities
Can you please advise status of this memory issue? We are hitting restrictions and would like to know if you anticipate a near-term solution. Thanks!
- Fri Mar 07, 2025 5:02 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: Enterprise vs Pro OCX naming
- Replies: 2
- Views: 68894
Enterprise vs Pro OCX naming
Something interesting that we see is the name of the OCX changes from time-to-time Between Enterprise and Pro (i.e., "KernelCAD Pro ActiveX Control module"). There appears to be no functional difference, so I'm curious if this is just an installation naming difference between, say, the Mer...
- Thu Mar 06, 2025 1:33 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: Build 5560 merge module
- Replies: 2
- Views: 71823
Re: Build 5560 merge module
Sorry, my bad. I inadvertently was looking at the size of the unzipped MSM itself (of 5559) to the ZIP with the redists (of 5560). All good.
- Wed Mar 05, 2025 5:29 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: Build 5560 merge module
- Replies: 2
- Views: 71823
Build 5560 merge module
I see that the size of the merge module has grown from 60 MB to over 100 MB between builds 5559 and 5560. Is this correct?
- Mon Feb 10, 2025 12:27 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: IGeometricObject_DG method errors
- Replies: 4
- Views: 95123
Re: IGeometricObject_DG method errors
Suggestion noted. I think all are happy to do our own archiving, so it might be worth putting a note on the website downloads page. Thanks!
- Sun Feb 09, 2025 3:02 pm
- Forum: DG Kernel discussions
- Topic: IGeometricObject_DG method errors
- Replies: 4
- Views: 95123
IGeometricObject_DG method errors
In the recent 7.2 updates, the IGeometricObject_DG.Rotate1 function is now throwing a "missing arguments" error. Yet, the VB6 object browser for ActiveX build 5555 shows the argument definition I've been using. (Also, I see in the most recent online documentation, that Rotate1 is no longer...